So... Monty it is then.
I've argued long and hard that Lyle was the man for the job - not necessarily because he's the best captain, but because it was a worthy honour for a man who achieved so much (Casey, Donald, Poulter et al don't even come close). To refuse his candidacy is effectively flicking two fingers to his standing and record. "Sorry, Sandy - you're too old mate, now f*** off" is as blunt a rebuke as was effectively dished out.
This is all effectively because the Euro's were "Faldoed" at the last Ryder Cup. Eeek, gasp, we lost - what went wrong? Er, must be the captain, as our players were the best (sound familiar? Ask Strange and Sutton). Oh, hang on... our captain was over 50... obviously out of touch. Ha, won't make that mistake again.
Enter Monty, stage left. He'll be a great captain, I'm sure of that. His strengths outweigh his weaknesses, and the latter are only evident when he fails as a player in individual comps. Even at Brookline, where Europe lost in controversial fashion and Monty was sickeningly abused, he kept his cool and his dignity.
But it doesn't change the fact - Lyle was shafted by a committee boasting one major between them, and that was Paul Lawrie's (no offence intended, Paul, but....). They should hang their collective heads in shame.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
Sandy is yesterday`s man.The tour players seem to want a Captain that is familiar with them and currently plays on the European Tour.This is what they want and Monty was the man of the moment.Olly will be 47 ,the same age as Monty in 2012 and he`ll get the nod then.At Gleneagles it`s McGinlay then Clarke and Westwood.So that`s your Captains for the next 10 years.Sandy`s had it I`m afraid .He`s well out of touch with the Tour now and another Faldo disaster has to be avoided.Monty is the correct choice when you weigh up the pros and cons ,so acept it.He`s the man to win us back the cup.With Sandy I would not be sure.
Post a Comment